Files
MediaCrawler/tests/test_douyin_fetch.py
T
butubb 3b6a437e6c
Deploy VitePress site to Pages / build (push) Canceled after 0s
Deploy VitePress site to Pages / Deploy (push) Canceled after 0s
feat(monitor): 抖音监控改走新的 Web 接口客户端(接上上一版的移植)
上一版只把客户端写出来、验证了它单独可用,**但没有接进任何地方** —— 所以你建的任务跑起来
仍然在调爬虫子进程,报的仍然是那句自己编的「account blocked」。这一步把它接上。

* runner 的 Phase 2 按平台分岔:dy 走进程内 HTTP 客户端(douyin_fetch),其余平台照旧走
  爬虫子进程。抖音那条不再起 Playwright、不再构造那串自相矛盾的浏览器指纹参数。
* 新增 douyin_fetch:把采到的东西写成 store/douyin 那套 jsonl 形状 —— **ingest 完全不知道
  数据是从哪来的**,重采样/差分/事件/通知/报表全都照旧,一个字没改。
* 失败不再假装:一条都没采到就以非零退出码 + **真实原因**交给 ingest,落成
  「采集进程异常退出(code=1):…」。绝不会再掉进「疑似登录失效」那个分支。
* 已知作品列表接口(aweme/post)被抖音单独加了真校验(200 + 空 body),所以加了退化:
  拿不到列表就用库里已知的 aweme_id 逐条走 detail 刷新。**边界是:已知作品的指标能继续
  更新,新作品发现不了** —— 这个边界会以一条 warning 日志留下痕迹,不让它看起来一切正常。
* 顺带给客户端补上 video_detail(实测可用:200 / 45425 字节),退化路径靠它。

测试 +6:产物目录与文件名、评论文件即使为空也要建(ingest 靠它区分「没评论」和
「什么都没抓到」)、重复作品只写一次、列表被挡时的退化、彻底失败仍写出产物与原因、
评论失败不连累作品。
2026-10-10 17:21:12 +08:00

191 lines
6.6 KiB
Python

# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
"""抖音采集编排 —— 不碰网络,把 douyin_api 整个换掉。
验的是编排本身:产物落在正确的目录、文件名是 store 那套、以及**作品列表被挡时的退化**
(用已知 aweme_id 逐条刷新)—— 那条退化路径决定了今天这个功能是「完全没用」还是
「已知作品还能看」。
"""
import json
import pytest
from api.monitor import douyin_api, douyin_fetch
def _video(aweme_id: str, likes: str = "1") -> dict:
return {
"aweme_id": aweme_id,
"title": f"title-{aweme_id}",
"aweme_url": f"https://www.douyin.com/video/{aweme_id}",
"cover_url": "",
"aweme_type": "0",
"create_time": 1790574515,
"creator_hash": "hash",
"nickname": "博主",
"liked_count": likes,
"comment_count": "0",
"collected_count": "0",
"share_count": "0",
}
def _comment(aweme_id: str, index: int) -> dict:
return {
"comment_id": f"c{index}",
"aweme_id": aweme_id,
"content": f"评论{index}",
"nickname": "路人",
"creator_hash": "h2",
"create_time": 1790574600,
"like_count": "0",
"sub_comment_count": "0",
"parent_comment_id": "0",
}
class _Target:
def __init__(self, external_id: str) -> None:
self.external_id = external_id
def _read(path):
return [json.loads(line) for line in path.read_text(encoding="utf-8").splitlines() if line]
async def _collect(tmp_path, **overrides):
kwargs = dict(
platform="dy",
mode="creator",
limit=20,
want_comments=True,
comment_limit=20,
targets=[_Target("MS4w-sec")],
cookie="sessionid=x",
)
kwargs.update(overrides)
return await douyin_fetch.collect(tmp_path, **kwargs)
class TestHappyPath:
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_writes_the_layout_ingest_expects(self, monkeypatch, tmp_path):
async def fake_videos(sec_user_id, count=20, *, cookie=""):
return [_video("111"), _video("222")]
async def fake_comments(aweme_id, count=20, *, cookie=""):
return [_comment(aweme_id, 1)]
monkeypatch.setattr(douyin_api, "author_videos", fake_videos)
monkeypatch.setattr(douyin_api, "video_comments", fake_comments)
result = await _collect(tmp_path)
assert result["notes"] == 2
assert result["comments"] == 2
assert result["errors"] == []
# 目录名必须是 douyin(不是平台 id dy)—— ingest 找文件用的是同一个来源。
jsonl_dir = tmp_path / "douyin" / "jsonl"
assert jsonl_dir.is_dir()
contents = list(jsonl_dir.glob("*_contents_*.jsonl"))
comments = list(jsonl_dir.glob("*_comments_*.jsonl"))
assert len(contents) == 1
assert len(comments) == 1
notes = _read(contents[0])
assert [n["aweme_id"] for n in notes] == ["111", "222"]
# 键名照抄 store/douyin —— ingest 靠这个读出来。
assert notes[0]["aweme_url"] == "https://www.douyin.com/video/111"
# 秒,不是毫秒;换算交给 adapters。
assert notes[0]["create_time"] == 1790574515
assert _read(comments[0])[0]["aweme_id"] == "111"
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_the_comment_file_exists_even_without_comments(self, monkeypatch, tmp_path):
"""评论文件必须建出来。
ingest 靠「文件在不在」区分「这一轮没评论」和「这一轮什么都没抓到」——
两种情况的含义完全不同。
"""
async def fake_videos(sec_user_id, count=20, *, cookie=""):
return [_video("111")]
monkeypatch.setattr(douyin_api, "author_videos", fake_videos)
await _collect(tmp_path, want_comments=False)
assert len(list((tmp_path / "douyin" / "jsonl").glob("*_comments_*.jsonl"))) == 1
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_duplicate_works_are_written_once(self, monkeypatch, tmp_path):
async def fake_videos(sec_user_id, count=20, *, cookie=""):
return [_video("111"), _video("111")]
monkeypatch.setattr(douyin_api, "author_videos", fake_videos)
result = await _collect(tmp_path, want_comments=False)
assert result["notes"] == 1
class TestDegradation:
"""作品列表被挡时的行为 —— 决定了这个功能今天有没有用。"""
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_falls_back_to_refreshing_known_works(self, monkeypatch, tmp_path):
async def blocked(sec_user_id, count=20, *, cookie=""):
raise douyin_api.DouyinApiError("接口返回了空内容")
refreshed = []
async def fake_detail(aweme_id, *, cookie=""):
refreshed.append(aweme_id)
return _video(aweme_id, likes="9")
monkeypatch.setattr(douyin_api, "author_videos", blocked)
monkeypatch.setattr(douyin_api, "video_detail", fake_detail)
result = await _collect(
tmp_path, want_comments=False, known_aweme_ids=["999", "888"]
)
assert refreshed == ["999", "888"]
assert result["notes"] == 2
# 但错误照样报出来 —— 这一轮是「部分可用」,不是「一切正常」,别粉饰。
assert any("作品列表失败" in error for error in result["errors"])
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_nothing_at_all_still_reports_the_reason(self, monkeypatch, tmp_path):
async def blocked(sec_user_id, count=20, *, cookie=""):
raise douyin_api.DouyinApiError("接口返回了空内容")
monkeypatch.setattr(douyin_api, "author_videos", blocked)
result = await _collect(tmp_path, want_comments=False)
assert result["notes"] == 0
assert result["errors"]
# 产物仍然写出来(空的),让调用方去判断这是失败而不是「这个博主没作品」。
assert (tmp_path / "douyin" / "jsonl").is_dir()
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_a_failing_comment_fetch_does_not_lose_the_work(self, monkeypatch, tmp_path):
async def fake_videos(sec_user_id, count=20, *, cookie=""):
return [_video("111")]
async def broken_comments(aweme_id, count=20, *, cookie=""):
raise douyin_api.DouyinApiError("评论接口抽风")
monkeypatch.setattr(douyin_api, "author_videos", fake_videos)
monkeypatch.setattr(douyin_api, "video_comments", broken_comments)
result = await _collect(tmp_path)
# 评论拿不到是小事,作品不能跟着丢。
assert result["notes"] == 1
assert any("评论失败" in error for error in result["errors"])