Files
MediaCrawler/api/monitor/scheduler.py
T
butubb 06718a1351
Deploy VitePress site to Pages / build (push) Canceled after 0s
Deploy VitePress site to Pages / Deploy (push) Canceled after 0s
feat(monitor): 抖音接入博主监控
上游爬虫本身不缺抖音能力(三模式、四项指标、二级评论都与小红书对等、指标还是同名同列),
缺的全在监控层的适配。这次把「平台之间不一样」的管子集中到一个新模块,再把散落的
xhs 硬编码接上去。

* 新增 api/monitor/adapters.py:产物目录名、jsonl 字段别名、目标链接形态与正则、
  通知链接模板。不放进 platforms.py 是因为那个模块被 describe_all() 整个序列化进
  /api/config/platforms 交给前端,塞进正则和目录名会让爬虫内部细节漏进 API 载荷。
  代价是两个注册表可能漂移,用一条测试钉住「声明接通就必须有适配器」。
* 两个必须知道的坑,都在这版里处理掉了:
  1) 抖音的平台 id 是 dy,而 store 把产物写在 douyin/ 下(store/douyin/_store_impl.py:47)。
     不改就是 ingest 一个文件都读不到 —— 不报错,只是 0 条,然后被冒充成「疑似登录失效」。
  2) 抖音的作品没有 note_id(叫 aweme_id)、评论也用 aweme_id 指作品。ingest 第一步是
     `if not note_id: continue`,不映射就逐条全丢。
  另外抖音顶层评论的 parent_comment_id 是字符串 "0",归一成空串,免得前端多出悬空的父节点。
* 顺带把「东西抓到了、只是没落在期望目录里」单独识别出来。这类故障的现象和登录失效
  一模一样,按登录失效报会把人指去查完全错误的方向。
* 修两个既有 bug(今天只有小红书所以无害,加抖音就踩响):
  - service.py update_task 换目标时漏传 task.platform,回落到默认小红书
  - scheduler.py 取 cookie 没传 platform,抖音任务会读着小红书那份 cookie 不动
* 行为变更(已与用户确认):cookie 闸门改成「没 cookie 且没开 CDP」才跳过。
  CDP 模式下登录态来自被接管的浏览器,粘不粘 cookie 由不得它决定;不放行的话,
  选了「接管已有 Chrome」却没粘 cookie 的用户会看到任务永远不触发,而且不报错。
  副作用是开启了 CDP 的小红书任务也不再被该闸门拦住 —— 语义上是对的。
* 目标输入框的示例链接与措辞改由能力矩阵提供(notes_label 抖音说「作品」、小红书说
  「笔记」;「建议只填纯 ID」是小红书专属劝告,抖音链接不带令牌,不再显示)。

测试 +22 条(858 通过),其中最关键的是「抖音作品/评论不被静默丢弃」与「产物目录名
不等于平台 id」两条 —— 都是把最难查的失败模式钉死在回归网里。

注意:抖音这条路的**端到端尚未验证**,需要一份可用的抖音登录态(CDP 那台 Chrome 里
登录,或导出一份 cookie)。单测覆盖的是解析与入库,真实抓取还没跑过。
2026-10-10 14:55:28 +08:00

269 lines
11 KiB
Python

# -*- coding: utf-8 -*-
# Copyright (c) 2025 [email protected]
#
# This file is part of MediaCrawler project.
# Repository: https://github.com/NanmiCoder/MediaCrawler/blob/main/api/monitor/scheduler.py
# GitHub: https://github.com/NanmiCoder
# Licensed under NON-COMMERCIAL LEARNING LICENSE 1.1
#
# 声明:本代码仅供学习和研究目的使用。使用者应遵守以下原则:
# 1. 不得用于任何商业用途。
# 2. 使用时应遵守目标平台的使用条款和robots.txt规则。
# 3. 不得进行大规模爬取或对平台造成运营干扰。
# 4. 应合理控制请求频率,避免给目标平台带来不必要的负担。
# 5. 不得用于任何非法或不当的用途。
#
# 详细许可条款请参阅项目根目录下的LICENSE文件。
# 使用本代码即表示您同意遵守上述原则和LICENSE中的所有条款。
"""Background scheduler for monitor tasks.
One asyncio loop polls for due tasks and hands them to the runner. A plain loop
is enough here: there is exactly one process, one global crawler subprocess, and
therefore no concurrency to coordinate -- a cron-style library would add a
dependency without adding a capability.
Two families of schedule, and the difference matters:
* ``interval`` is **fixed-delay**, not fixed-rate -- ``next_run_at`` is measured
from the moment a run starts, so a slow run cannot make its task fire
back-to-back.
* the clock modes (``daily``/``weekly``) are **fixed-time** -- recomputed from the
calendar, so a run that starts late does not drag every later run with it.
The arithmetic for both lives in schedule.py.
The loop also carries the 上游更新检查: it is not a crawl, so it shares none of
the rules above (no subprocess, no active-hours gate) -- see
``_maybe_check_upstream``. It rides this loop rather than getting a thread of its
own because it is one HTTP-shaped fetch per day.
"""
import asyncio
import random
from datetime import datetime
from typing import Optional
from sqlalchemy import select
from tools.time_util import get_current_timestamp
from ..services import crawler_manager
from . import app_settings, schedule, upstream
from .db import get_session
from .models import MonitorRun, MonitorTask, RUN_INTERRUPTED, RUN_RUNNING
from .runner import execute_task
from .settings import get_cookie
POLL_INTERVAL_SECONDS = 20
# Spread tasks sharing an interval so they do not all come due on the same tick.
# Applied to interval mode only -- see the advance step below.
JITTER_SECONDS = 60
class MonitorScheduler:
"""Polls the task table and runs whatever is due."""
def __init__(self) -> None:
self._loop_task: Optional[asyncio.Task] = None
self._stopping = asyncio.Event()
# Avoids logging "no cookie" on every single tick. Per platform, because
# warning once for Xiaohongshu must not silence the warning for Douyin.
self._warned_no_cookie: set = set()
async def start(self) -> None:
if self._loop_task is not None and not self._loop_task.done():
return
self._stopping.clear()
self._loop_task = asyncio.create_task(self._run_loop())
async def stop(self) -> None:
self._stopping.set()
if self._loop_task is not None:
self._loop_task.cancel()
try:
await self._loop_task
except asyncio.CancelledError:
pass
self._loop_task = None
async def _run_loop(self) -> None:
try:
await self.recover()
except Exception as exc: # pragma: no cover - defensive
print(f"[monitor.scheduler] recovery failed: {exc}")
while not self._stopping.is_set():
try:
await self.tick()
except Exception as exc: # pragma: no cover - keep the loop alive
print(f"[monitor.scheduler] tick failed: {exc}")
# 独立于采集任务,因此单独一段 try:上游检查失败不该影响采集调度,
# 反过来也一样。
try:
await self._maybe_check_upstream()
except Exception as exc: # pragma: no cover - keep the loop alive
print(f"[monitor.scheduler] upstream check failed: {exc}")
await asyncio.sleep(POLL_INTERVAL_SECONDS)
async def _maybe_check_upstream(self) -> None:
"""到点就 fetch 一次上游仓库,看它有没有新提交。
与采集任务的三条规则都不同,各有理由:它不碰浏览器、也不占采集子进程,
所以不看 ``is_busy``;它只发一个 git 请求,没有被平台风控的风险,所以也不
受活跃时段限制 —— 定时检查放在半夜反而是最合适的。
"""
async with get_session() as session:
if not await app_settings.get_value(
session, "upstream_check_enabled", fallback=False
):
return
interval_minutes = int(
await app_settings.get_value(
session, "upstream_check_interval_minutes", fallback=1440
)
)
state = await upstream.load_state(session)
checked_at = int(state.get("checked_at") or 0)
now = get_current_timestamp()
# 失败也会写 checked_at,所以不通的时候同样是每个间隔重试一次,
# 而不是每个 tick(20 秒)都去撞一次墙。
if checked_at and now - checked_at < max(1, interval_minutes) * 60_000:
return
result = await upstream.run_check()
if result.get("behind"):
print(
f"[monitor.scheduler] 上游 {result.get('branch')} 领先 "
f"{result['behind']} 个提交"
)
elif not result.get("ok"):
print(f"[monitor.scheduler] 上游检查失败:{result.get('error')}")
async def recover(self) -> None:
"""Clean up state left behind by a server restart.
A run still marked ``running`` cannot be running -- its subprocess died
with the previous process. Marking it interrupted stops it from blocking
the UI as a phantom in-flight run.
"""
async with get_session() as session:
stale = (
await session.scalars(
select(MonitorRun).where(MonitorRun.status == RUN_RUNNING)
)
).all()
for run in stale:
run.status = RUN_INTERRUPTED
run.finished_at = get_current_timestamp()
if stale:
print(
f"[monitor.scheduler] marked {len(stale)} interrupted run(s) "
f"left over from a previous process"
)
async def tick(self) -> None:
"""Run one due task, if the crawler is free and we are in the active window."""
# The crawler subprocess is a global singleton, so a manual crawl and a
# monitor run cannot overlap. Returning without advancing next_run_at
# leaves the task due, and it is picked up on a later tick.
if crawler_manager.is_busy():
return
async with get_session() as session:
if not await self._within_active_hours(session):
# Deliberately does not advance next_run_at: the task simply runs
# when the window next opens, rather than being skipped for a day.
return
await self._run_due_task()
async def _within_active_hours(self, session) -> bool:
"""Whether scheduled runs are allowed right now (local time)."""
start, end = await app_settings.active_hours(session)
hour = datetime.now().hour
if start <= end:
return start <= hour <= end
# Window wraps past midnight, e.g. 22 -> 6.
return hour >= start or hour <= end
async def _run_due_task(self) -> None:
async with get_session() as session:
task = await session.scalar(
select(MonitorTask)
.where(
MonitorTask.enabled.is_(True),
MonitorTask.next_run_at.is_not(None),
MonitorTask.next_run_at <= get_current_timestamp(),
)
.order_by(MonitorTask.next_run_at)
.limit(1)
)
if task is None:
return
# 没有 cookie 就跳过,是为了不让任务每轮白跑一趟出个认证失败。任务留在
# due 状态而不推进 —— 用户一粘上 cookie 它就能自己跑起来。
#
# **但开着 CDP 时必须放行**:那种模式下登录态来自被接管的那个浏览器,
# 粘不粘 cookie 根本轮不到它决定成败。不放行的话,选了「接管已有 Chrome」
# 却没粘 cookie 的用户会发现任务永远不被触发,而且什么错都不报。
cookie = await get_cookie(session, task.platform)
if not cookie:
cdp_enabled = await app_settings.get_value(
session, "cdp_enabled", fallback=False
)
if not cdp_enabled:
if task.platform not in self._warned_no_cookie:
print(
f"[monitor.scheduler] no {task.platform} cookie configured; "
"scheduled tasks will not run until one is set or CDP is enabled"
)
self._warned_no_cookie.add(task.platform)
return
self._warned_no_cookie.discard(task.platform)
# Advance before running so a crash mid-run cannot cause an immediate
# re-fire, and so a long outage coalesces into a single run instead
# of one run per missed interval.
now = get_current_timestamp()
following = schedule.next_occurrence(
mode=task.schedule_mode,
interval_minutes=task.interval_minutes,
hours=schedule.parse_hours(task.schedule_hours),
days=schedule.parse_days(task.schedule_days),
minute=task.schedule_minute,
after_ms=now,
)
if following is None:
# A clock schedule with no times can never fire. The API rejects
# that shape, so this guards against a hand-edited row: park the
# task with no next run rather than leaving it permanently due and
# re-running it on every tick.
task.next_run_at = None
print(
f"[monitor.scheduler] task {task.id} has no usable schedule "
f"and will not run until one is set"
)
elif task.schedule_mode == schedule.MODE_INTERVAL:
# Jitter belongs to the interval mode only. Spreading identical
# intervals apart is the point; nudging a time the operator
# explicitly picked is not -- it just looks like a broken clock.
task.next_run_at = following + random.randint(0, JITTER_SECONDS) * 1000
else:
task.next_run_at = following
task_id = task.id
try:
await execute_task(task_id, trigger="scheduled")
except Exception as exc:
print(f"[monitor.scheduler] task {task_id} failed: {exc}")
# Global singleton, mirroring the crawler_manager pattern.
monitor_scheduler = MonitorScheduler()